Выпуск: 6 , Том: 17 , Год издания: 2023

The Chuya earthquake of 2003 exerted an appreciable influence on the seismicity of the entire Altai. This paper presents data on variations in the Altai seismicity from 2003 to 2021. It is shown that earthquakes of the first half-year after the major earthquake of 2003 had their rupture zones in the epicentral zone, while the other Altai structures were aseismic. After 2009 we saw changes both in the near zone that encompasses geological structures that were adjacent to the epicenter (with distances of 6080 km from the mainshock epicenter), such as the Aigulak, Kurai, South Chuisky and North Chuisky mountain ranges, and in the far zone at distances of 250450 km from the epicenter and in different directions from it. The Aigulak earthquake of 2019 gave rise to an aftershock process that displaced the center of Altai seismicity to the eponymous mountain range. There are no data on large earthquakes during the historical period for many Altai structures which have been activated following the Chuya earthquake, either from seismological or from paleo-geological evidence. One could explain the evolution of seismicity around the rupture zone of the Chuya earthquake in space, and with time delays of some years, invoking the influence of a large earthquake on a medium involving plasticity. We know of nonlinear models that hold promise for future research concerning the influence of large earthquakes on the evolution of seismicity in geological media.